The Bush Legacy, indeed!
| Live Weather Stations: East Gloucester | Rockport | Sandy Bay Yacht Club | GoMOOS Buoy | |||||
Gloucester Inner Harbor
![]() |
Sandy Bay Yacht Club
![]() |
Sandy Bay Yacht Club
![]() |
Lanes Cove
![]() |
||
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
thinkin |
The Bush Legacy |
Lead | |
|
The numbers for March just came in at 80,000+ jobs lost, taking the total to over 200,000 year-to-date (CNN).
The Bush Legacy, indeed! |
|||
Y DEVELOP |
|||
|
Uncle Sam is looking for a few good boys, um men.... |
|||
thinkin |
|||
|
This sort of dovetails with the topic of teacher (and any public servant) contract negotiations.
Ol' Ross Perot's favorite line about people not being able to pay their servants more than they earn themselves isn't just sloganeering: it's a matter of fact. When eyes get to big for the stomachs, it starts being a matter of having to cut jobs. NOBODY wants that. During the last recession, we finally convinced our unions and our boards to settle for one-year contracts. It was a win-win. Both negotiating parties could see small gains without feeling like they were stepping off of a cliff. By making smaller raises, we were able to retain staff, which made the parents--and the staff---happy. Yes, it meant more time in negotiating but it worked. And we did it again the next year. And the year after that. Once the economic situation started to ease, we reverted back to the 3-year contract. |
|||
oldhippie01930 |
|||
|
The Bush regime has been playing games with employment numbers much more than we have ever experienced in our history. "Jobs Lost" refers only to
jobs eliminated in large layoff actions. The kind that Wall Street knows about. America has been bleeding jobs for years now, and most of it has been a
continuous flow from numerous small hemorrhages. 200,000 is nonsense. Ten times that is much more likely. The regime reduced the duration of unemployment
payouts from 12 months down to 6 months, cutting the apparent unemployment rate in half. If we are currently hovering around 5%, then our rate (as measured
during the Clinton years) is 10%. That would be almost OK, if it weren't for the people who are still unemployed after 6 months of seeking work. Add to
these the unprecedented numbers of people who have given up looking and have slipped into increasingly lower standards of living and growing debt. Add to
these the people like my engineer friend who washes dishes for a living, those who earn a small fraction of their previous earnings. Add to these the numerous
baby-boomers who have taken "early retirement", without the wherewithal to do so. These people will run out of money and screw the younger
generations. None of these very real unemployment problems are reported by the Bush Regime. My personal guess is that the true number of unemployed and
underemployed in our country is now beyond 20%. And they say there is doubt about whether or not we are in a "recession". I don't give a crap
about the semantics, but I can say this without fear of contradiction: we are in very serious trouble and our "leadership" has no plan for dealing
with it. And why would they?....It doesn't affect them.
Last Edited By: oldhippie01930
04/04/08 02:40 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Gang of One |
|||
|
If anybody wants to be truly depressed about our leadership's lack of any exit strategy (or even giving a fuck) for the chronic economic state we are
in/headed for...watch the documentary 'Maxed Out' about the business of credit in this country.
I show it to all my students - it's quite the smack in the face for them. |
|||
o Realist o |
81%, Yes, 81% | ||
81% in Poll Say Nation Is Headed on Wrong TrackAmericans are more dissatisfied with the country's direction than at any time since the New York Times/CBS News poll began asking about the subject in the early 1990s, according to the latest poll. In the poll, 81 percent of respondents said they believed "things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track," up from 69 percent a year ago and 35 percent in early 2002. There is now nearly a national consensus that the country faces significant problems. A majority of nearly every demographic and political group - Democrats and Republicans, men and women, residents of cities and rural areas, college graduates and those who finished only high school - say the United States is headed in the wrong direction. Seventy-eight percent of respondents said the country was worse off than five years ago; just 4 percent said it was better off. The dissatisfaction is especially striking because public opinion usually hits its low point only in the months and years after an economic downturn, not at the beginning of one. Today, however, Americans report being deeply worried about the country even though many say their own personal finances are still in fairly good shape. Only 21 percent of respondents said the overall economy was in good condition, the lowest such number since late 1992, when the recession that began in the summer of 1990 had already been over for more than a year. In the latest poll, two in three people said they believed the economy was in recession today. The unhappiness presents clear risks for Republicans in this year's elections, given the continued unpopularity of President Bush.
Twenty-eight percent of respondents said they approved of the job he was doing, a number that has barely changed since last summer. But Democrats, who have
controlled the House and Senate since last year, also face the risk that unhappy voters will punish Congressional incumbents.
~ ~ the only people to get even with are those who have been kind to you ~ ~
Last Edited By: o Realist o
04/04/08 02:53 PM.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
leftwingnut |
|||
|
What subject do you teach, gang-banger? Apparently, booze and economics are included...
To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.-Theodore Roosevelt, The Kansas City Star, May 7, 1918 |
|||
Gang of One |
|||
|
Well, I actually have a terminal degree in 'booze-n-economics'...earned over many years of hands-on application!
At the risk of opening myself up for some predictable fuck-witted rudeness from my Rockport groupie about my career - It's a freshman course all the students must take. Official title: Freshman Seminar. My name for it: 'Growing Up 101'. It runs about 50/50 between academic skills and social/life skills. The buy-in is very poor at the start of it all ("Huh? I'm 18...I know everything already!"), but by the end of the semester, I've won the vast majority of them over to the value of it all. |
|||
o Realist o |
|||
|
What course(s) do you teach, LWN? Philosophy? What else? (not being facetious...)
~ ~ the only people to get even with are those who have been kind to you ~ ~ |
|||
brainfix |
|||
|
Damn GoO, where the hell were you when I needed you 34 years ago??
|
|||
Gang of One |
|||
|
Getting ready for Beer'n'Trytogetlaid U, just like you were...!
|
|||
brainfix |
|||
|
How typically true, you old sod! I mucked it up royally back then. Hindsight is 20/20.
|
|||
leftwingnut |
|||
Gang of One wrote: That's it -- you teach Frosh Seminar, and nothing else? I think I'd eat a bullet. What's your specialty?
To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.-Theodore Roosevelt, The Kansas City Star, May 7, 1918 |
|||
brainfix |
|||
|
GoO's contributions here far outweigh any freshman attempt to nail his ass down.
I saw that scenario long ago. |
|||
sidebar © ezdesign