There has been talk all year from the Beeman/Plum Cove community about the terrible overcrowding issues that these schools face. They are in a tough
situation with the huge influx of students this school year. They don't have enough classrooms, playground space, janitorial staff, etc. etc. Meanwhile,
the school slated to close, Fuller, is operating at about 1/3 of its capacity, has a huge cafeteria, full size gym, and immense field/playground space that are
totally underutilized.
Is this absolutely insane, or is it just me. They should have known how many students were going to be redistricted from Fuller to the other schools. They
should have known that crowding would be an issue based on the finite number of classrooms citywide. With a little planning, they could have had all 4th AND
5th graders at Fuller for the year while they figure out what to do next, and these crowding problems would be nonexistent. The building is open anyway,
offering virtually no cost savings. We are going to close Fuller just to save $250k a year, and put modulars at all of the other schools in the city, at a
debt cost that won't be made up by the Fuller building savings for what, 15 years? The idea of small learning communities is great in theory, but it seems
we don't have the resources or the space to implement such a plan. What are the chances that the new modular classrooms will be here for the start of the
next school year? Are we going to need another plan like the Fuller 5th one that was used this year? Sorry to ramble on and on, would love to hear any
thoughts on these issues...











