| Live Weather Stations: East Gloucester | Rockport | Sandy Bay Yacht Club | GoMOOS Buoy | |||||
Gloucester Inner Harbor
![]() |
Sandy Bay Yacht Club
![]() |
Sandy Bay Yacht Club
![]() |
Lanes Cove
![]() |
||
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Insider2004 |
|||
|
I wonder what kind of turnout there is for her report tonight.
|
|||
Insider2004 |
re | ||
|
I'd be interested to know what the Q and A was if any.
|
|||
mya crakstinks |
|||
|
no plan goodgrief
|
|||
gloucesterkid |
|||
|
Did anybody go tonight? The report has yet to show up on the city website, or the Times' or Beacon's for that matter.
|
|||
peregrine |
|||
|
Published: April 10, 2008 06:34 am ShareThis PrintThis
Gloucester: State of the City: Grim, says Kirk By Richard Gaines Staff writer The Gloucester that Mayor Carolyn Kirk pictured yesterday is a city in a dire, unsustainable condition, its own flaws and chronic failings - including a $1 million discrepancy in the books - compounded by higher-level policies that have a general chronically weakening effect. While recovery is possible, purging the ills will not come easily or quickly, the new mayor made clear repeatedly during what she described as the "first annual" State of the City address. The presentation, distilled from findings in her first 100 days as mayor, redeems the campaign promise on which she anchored her appeal to voters last year - to provide the analytical basis for fiscal and policy decisions that the city had sorely been missing. "It will take at least two years to turn the corner," Kirk said in a midday interview, after she delivered her findings privately to the municipal work force yesterday morning and before the 7 p.m. public report. The Fuller School auditorium was about one-third filled for the evening's 90-minute PowerPoint presentation. Reaction from the crowd of more than 200 was positive, especially to Kirk's commitment to "put the cards on the table," in the phrase of Alphonse Swekla, the retired city councilor and school administrator. "She did an awesome job," commented developer Michael Carrigan. Former Mayor William Rafter lauded "a willingness at transparency," and Web and business consultant Peter Van Ness said, "it's great to know where the city stands." Kirk said the immediate challenge is resolving questions about past practices and curtailing "deficit spending" in the budget she inherited, then crafting a "turnaround" budget for fiscal 2009, which begins July 1, before beginning the "comeback" in fiscal 2010. Kirk announced a $800,000 shortfall in the budget cycle that ends June 30. After receiving the 80 pages and screen printout in Washington, where he was on business, Council President Bruce Tobey praised Kirk's "just the facts, ma'am" approach. No layoffs were announced, but in her presentation she identified a $2.5 million shortfall in the coming municipal budget for fiscal 2009, and identified layoffs as a last resort to close the gap. The immediate challenge, Kirk said, is bringing order out of a fiscal chaos so extreme the city is believed by the state to have been illegally "deficit spending" for the past six years, is under orders to hire auditing specialists to reconcile a $1 million "variance" in the books for fiscal 2007, can expect an "adverse opinion" from its independent auditors and faces a "strong likelihood" of a bond-rating downgrade. "The good news is that I don't think it can get any worse," she proclaimed to applause. She was also applauded when she said making the case for structural relief was "why I want to go before Congress." Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., has agreed to find an appropriate meeting for Kirk to bring a condensed version of her message to the U.S. Senate. She thanked Congressman John Tierney, D-Salem, for assigning a staff member to the presentation. Absent relief from Washington or Boston, which she indicated she does not expect, Kirk asked residents to gird for long-term austerity, and emphasized the need to jump-start the economy, especially around the waterfront. She castigated the state for "taking more" and "giving less." The differential loss for next year, Kirk said, is calculated to be $319,272. This analysis reprises her initial work on the inequities in the state school aid formula. Made in 2004 during her first term on the School Committee, Kirk's "lemon list" report became her political signature and remains definitive. At its core is proof that Gloucester is one of about 100 communities that have yet to be restored to 2002 levels of state aid. Yesterday, she expanded on the theme in an explanation of the flaws in Proposition 21/2, which allows property tax growth in late-developing suburbs but limits tax growth in older cities like Gloucester. She also chided the Legislature for refusing to cede to municipalities local taxing flexibility. "Expectations of the community need to be realigned," Kirk wrote. "The city is doing less with less." With basic city government costs - for health insurance, sand, salt, macadam, building materials and energy - climbing more rapidly than revenues and without tax policy flexibility, she projected that march-in-place budgets will continue to outpace revenues for the foreseeable future. Kirk previously announced an agreement with federal and state environmental enforcers to consider easing deadlines on more than $150 million in mandated infrastructure projects to cushion the burden. Yesterday, she noted that the city's capital debt burden is finally nearing 12 percent of revenue, the maximum level considered prudent by Moody's, the bond-rating agency, and the state Department of Revenue. Much of the material in her report was not new, but her announcement that the auditors "can't account for about $1 million in deposits" in the books for fiscal 2007, which ended last June, was a revelation. The discrepancy puts in jeopardy state aid payments and even the approval of next year's tax rates, though Kirk said, "Gloucester is not a candidate for receivership according to the Department of Revenue." She told the Times solving the "mystery" has become the city's highest priority. "The $1 million variance is too big to ignore," she told the Fuller audience, which responded with applause. The discrepancy could be "related" to the Unifund municipal financial software system which was purchased in 2005 and has frustrated auditors and financial officials ever since, but the mayor added, "Nothing has been ruled out." The inability to reconcile the '07 books - and understand the $1 million discrepancy - is having a rippling effect on the city's finances and reputation. "Fiscal 2007 needs to be rebuilt from scratch," she wrote. "An outside firm will be brought in to reconstruct and perform the auditing function." She said the stabilization fund, a prime indicator for Moody's bond-raters, would likely be drawn down to finance the re-review of the '07 books. Also related to the $1 million discrepancy is the likely finding of "an adverse opinion" by the independent auditors. According to the Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms, an adverse opinion implies the financial statements "do not accurately" show the financial condition or operating results, and "investors should be extremely cautious about investing in any company with an adverse opinion from its auditors." The taint from such a finding combined with the city's tenuous hold on the A2 rating which Moody's reaffirmed last year but with a negative outlook has created the "strong likelihood the rating will be downgraded," wrote Cinder McNerney, the city's financial adviser and managing director of First Southwest Co. in Boston. As a coda to her presentation, Kirk announced her intention to create a Charter Commission to modify the form of government. She said she favored a four-year term for the mayor rather than the present two years and staggered terms for the council and School Committee. She announced community meetings on the State of the City for Lanesville, at the community center, on Monday, April 14; Annisquam in the Village Church Hall, on Thursday, April 17; and Magnolia, at the library, on April 24. All meetings will begin at 7 p.m. She promised quarterly progress reports. State Rep. Anthony Verga and his challengers for his seat at the Statehouse, Astrid afKlinteberg and Ann-Margaret Ferrante, all praised Kirk for the detailed effort to define the city's challenges. Richard Gaines may be contacted at rgaines@gloucestertimes.com. |
|||
mya crakstinks |
|||
|
no answers no plan where is the plan?
|
|||
tyu12 |
report | ||
|
She can start by saying NO to the 1.5 million dollar budget increase asked for by the school dept.
|
|||
Foresta Gump |
|||
|
Actually, from what I heard, she did point out the everyone INCLUDING the School Dept had to start making concessions to get through the next few years.
'LIFE IS LIKE A BOX OF CHOCOLATES...YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GONNA GET'
|
|||
Insider2004 |
|||
|
IT seems she over promised a little bit.
Kirk promised a new approach, built on fiscal forecasting and promised a professional business plan within 100 days as a road map for the city's recovery. Gloucester Daily Times November 2007 By the time she takes office, she believes she'll have a plan of how to deal with the estimated $3 million deficit the city is already facing for the next fiscal year budget. "I'll have a defined deficit so we can have an accurate framework for decision-making," said Kirk, a native of Clinton, N.Y., who has lived in Gloucester for 20 years. Boston Globe, December 2007 In April, my first budget will also be published. It will contain strategic measures for lifting the Austerity Order and will in all likelihood reflect the harsh reality of the inevitable budget correction that we are in for. I will also put my administration's recommendations in the context of a comprehensive plan for putting Gloucester back on the path to fiscal health. Inauguration Speech, January 2008 |
|||
elliegal |
|||
|
Maybe it was just much more complicated than she had hoped. At any rate, I don't think most people are as fixated on that point as you seem to be,
Insider. I mean, we get your point and everything but.....
|
|||
Y DEVELOP |
|||
|
What kind of plan were you neysayers expecting? Get real! She is accounting for unsolved funds, stopping the growth of city expenditures and forecasting out
for the next 4 years. THAT IS THE PLAN. Did you expect her to waive a magic wand and make it all better?
|
|||
Insider2004 |
|||
|
What kin dof plan were the naysayers, expecting? Probably only what was promised.
Most people are pleased that she's figured out the state of the City. I think some (not me) expected her to propose a series of solutions. Not waive a magic wand, but lay out a clear game plan. In retrospect, maybe she didn't know how much of a mess the City was in and, with that knowledge, wouldn't have focused her campaign so much on "the Kirk Plan" nor promised a "comprehensive plan to get the City on track". Also, the fact that the State of the City is "Grim" shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. |
|||
Y DEVELOP |
|||
|
She has a plan! WHy don't you get it? Re-read my post. WTF do you expect?
|
|||
Insider2004 |
|||
|
Y Develop,
With all due respect, what are the first three steps of her plan? |
|||
Foresta Gump |
Editorial on the mark | ||
|
From the GDTimes today....
Published: April 10, 2008 06:42 am Editorial: School Committee must live within mayor's limit for budget hike
The Gloucester School Committee has unanimously demanded a budget increase of 4.3 percent - an increase it says it needs just to keep "treading water," or simply to maintain the programs and services it provides now. That is a problem - a very big problem. It is a problem because the proposed spending plan of $36.6 million is a half-million dollars more than Mayor Carolyn Kirk says is available to the schools for the coming fiscal year. Kirk is trying to get control of the city's finances, and if the School Committee refuses to live within the limits set by the mayor, every other department will be inclined to do the same. It is also a problem because it shows that the School Department has a structural deficit. It has built cost increases into its contracts with employees that exceed the rate of inflation. If unchecked, this means the department will need an increase every year that exceeds the cost of living - and that will not work as this cash-strapped city moves forward, even with reforms. That means voters would have to approve an override every year to keep pace with that demand - and that's hard to imagine at this point as well. To talk, as committee members did Monday night, of having no more room for "further cuts" is both misleading and Orwellian. Clearly, if the committee were to abide by the limit set by the mayor, it would not be suffering a budget cut at all from the current year. It would still have an increase of 2.8 percent - more in line with inflation and still generous, given the fiscal straits of the city. If committee members truly believe that education - as in services to "the children" - will be harmed by living within the mayor's budget, they should go back to the bargaining table with teachers and other staff. If everybody's interests are truly aimed at serving children, then teachers and others should be willing to make modest sacrifices in their contract terms to preserve those services. When school committees or unions are demanding more from taxpayers, they generally invoke "the children," as if higher salaries or better benefits for adults are providing services to students. "Children are our future," taxpayers are also told. And that is true - they are. But the committee will do those children no favors to present them with unaffordable education budgets when they reach adulthood and have to start paying the bills. And it's frankly hard to see how the step raises many teachers get on top of annual pay hikes and the generous benefit packages they enjoy really benefit "the children." A 2.8 percent increase is not a cut. The School Committee should find a way to live with that - for the sake of today's taxpayers, and for the children who will be tomorrow's taxpayers as well.
'LIFE IS LIKE A BOX OF CHOCOLATES...YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GONNA GET'
|
|||
Y DEVELOP |
|||
She is accounting for unsolved funds, stopping the growth of city expenditures and forecasting out for the next 4 years. THAT IS THE PLAN.That is 1,2, and 3. Doesn't seem like much but believe it or not Bell and Tobey did less. Bell allowed unchecked development which causes the city big $$$ and Tobey built up the city employment roll. I think this is a splendid plan. |
|||
MissDimples |
|||
|
I have to agree with Y on this one. Her plan is to demand accountability, sacrifice in lieu of rhetoric, and stop the bleeding.
|
|||
Y DEVELOP |
|||
|
Brilliant MissD, nice to se you coming around. Can we attribute this to the lovely weather, better sleeping habits or all around good health? Whatever, bravo
and remember, every journey begins with a single step.
|
|||
MissDimples |
|||
|
Don't worry, Y. We don't agree often enough that either of us should be concerned about it.
However, if it becomes a trend, we'll have to rethink our positions.
|
|||
Y DEVELOP |
|||
However, if it becomes a trend, we'll have to rethink our positions.Point made -point taken.
|
|||
sidebar © ezdesign