It amazes me how fact checkers screw up so often.For the record (and believe me I know more about publishing and intellectual property law than I want to know) book publishers do not use fact checkers. Magazines do because they are the copyright holders and their writers are work-for-hires but with book publishing the publishing contract specifies who is responsible for content (usually the author) and there is always an allowance for a certain amount of error. Having been in the position of editing a number of books I can tell you that fact checking is a Herculean job and it is often next to impossible to get a straight answer. If publishers had to compensate editors for the amount of time they spend tracking down minutea books would cost three times what they do now
So, leftwingnut, still want to get a major publication to do an article about Gloucester?









