Willard J Clinton wrote:
>>>Agreed, Martin -- I suspect if the recall election were held today, Kirk would receive an even higher proportion of the vote than she did in November...<<< leftwingsimpleton
Another idiotarian rumination from leftwingsimpleton, considering we don't even know who would be running against her yet.
There are many of us who voted for her in part because she indicated that she was going to bring the school department back into reality with the rest of us. Besides her penchant for blaming others for shitstorms she had a large hand in setting off herself, she is turning out to be a worse collaborator with the racketeers running the monopoly that is ripping us off than any of the "good old boys" could have dreamed. Instead of the reforms promised, we again get massive increases in water and sewer rates right off the bat.
Any half decent challenger would dispatch her easily in a recall election.
Seriously (if you can, Willy) what should she have done in the six months she's held office to deal with your nemeses?
